Global searching is not enabled.
Skip to main content

The Embryos to Transfer in IVF/ICSI

"last update: 6 August 2024"  

- Recommendation

1.Number of embryos transferred

It is recommended that clinicians should perform single embryo transfer (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9

Conditions of compulsory eSET

●  Medical SET is indicated for women in whom multiple pregnancy represents an a priori increased risk compared to the overall population such as women with congenital uterine anomalies (e.g. septate uterus), bad obstetric history (e.g. previous premature birth <32 gestational weeks) and severe systemic diseases (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes).(strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)

●  Elective single embryo transfer should be used in cases with PGTA (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9 .

PGT and particularly PGT-A is associated with a higher implantation rate regardless of the age, and double euploid embryo transfer may be associated with a higher MPR.5.6 Low- to moderate-quality evidence shows that eSET of euploid embryos minimizes the risk multiple pregnancies without affecting LBR.7,8 The ASRM guideline recommends the transfer of one euploid embryo regardless of the female’s age.9

Conditions of preferred eSET with a maximum of two embryos allowed

● It is recommended to encourage eSET in good-prognosis patients although a maximum of two embryos is allowed after proper counseling. In cases of DET, a written consent explaining the risks of multiple pregnancies should be signed. (conditional recommendation - very low grade
evidence) 4,9,10,14

Good prognosis patients include:

- First or second IVF attempt whether fresh or frozen ET and excellent embryo quality by morphology. It should be emphasized that DET may have in most studies a higher LBR compared to eSET, but this is at the expense of significantly higher MPR. The higher MPR with DET is a consistent finding whether the embryos are fresh or frozen, cleavage stage or blastocysts, good-quality or mixed (one good & one poor-quality) or two poor-quality embryos.16-21
- Surplus embryos of sufficient quality to warrant cryopreservation, or in cases of FET, the availability of vitrified high-quality day 5 or day 6 blastocysts for transfer.22
- Previously pregnancy/live birth particularly if resulting from IVF. This is associated with an increased chance of LBR and MPR.23,27 Other studies confirmed the association of previous pregnancy with LBR but with no correlation with MPR.27,30
● Females <38 years of age should be strongly encouraged to transfer one embryo especially if they meet the criteria of good prognosis. Emphasis on eSET is highly recommended if the female age is <35 years  (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9 .
● Females between 38 and 40 years are allowed to transfer two embryos, however, eSET can still be encouraged especially if they have good prognosis. (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9 .
● Females 41-42 years of age should receive no more than two embryos. (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9 .

● In FET cycles, the decisions should be based on the age of the woman when the embryos were cryopreserved. (strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 4,9 .


2.Ultrasound guided embryo transfer

Trans-abdominal  ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer is recommended as it improves clinical pregnancy rate and live-birth rate. (strong recommendation- high grade evidence ) 35,36 .

One of the most critical steps in the process of in vitro fertilization (IVF) is the embryo transfer. Studies have consistently demonstrated that embryo transfer pregnancy rates differ depending upon the clinician performing the procedure31.

Three randomized controlled trials compared TV-US versus TA-US 32,34comparing 93 TV-US and 93 TA-US, found no differences in implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates between the two approaches.

The patient should attend the ET procedure with a full bladder. This straightens the angle between the uterine cervix and uterine body 35,36 and facilitates visualization using the transabdominal US scan. A straighter cervical canal and smaller inclination of the uterine body facilitate the effortless insertion of an ET catheter into the correct spot in the uterine cavity 37. It was suggested in a large study by 38 that performing ET with a full bladder increases the clinical pregnancy rate.


3. Type of catheter

● It is  recommended to use a soft embryo transfer catheter as it improves the pregnancy rate in fresh and Frozen cycles. (strong  recommendation- high grade evidence ) 39,41

NB. Soft catheter is defined as any embryo transfer catheter with a soft inner catheter. 

The pooled data of two randomized control trials and two cohort trials showed that pregnancy rates are higher using soft catheters for embryo transfer compared with firm catheters (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.16–1.59) 39,41.No soft embryo transfer catheter is clearly superior and that commercially available soft catheters perform similarly. Personal choice and cost can guide differential use of one soft catheter over the other (ASRM practice committee 2017) Data not enough to recommend a certain type of soft catheters.


4. Anesthesia during transfer

●  Anesthesia during embryo transfer  does not improve pregnancy rates. Given that there are added risks associated with anesthesia, routine anesthesia is not recommended in IVF-embryo transfer. ( strong recommendation -high grade evidence ) 42 .

Large cohort study conducted by vander Van and colleagues 1988, showed a pregnancy rate of 18% in the embryo transfers without anesthesia, and 19% in the embryo transfers with anesthesia. In this larger comparison, general anesthesia did not have a beneficial impact on pregnancy rate 42.


5. Site of embryo placement

● It is recommended to place  the catheter tip in the upper or middle (central) area of the uterine cavity, greater than 1 cm from the fundus as this decreases embryo expulsion and optimizes pregnancy rates. (Conditional recommendation -moderate grade evidence ) 44,45.

Avoiding touching the uterine fundus is one of the most important factors leading to a successful transfer. However the depth of the catheter inside the uterus and how far from the fundus should the embryo should be placed in the uterus was the subject of 4 randomized trials 43,46 . Coroleu et al 2002 43 studied  a total of 180 consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer were randomized to three study groups according to the distance between the tip of the catheter and the uterine fundus at the moment of the embryo deposition in the lumen of the endometrial cavity: group 1: 10 +/- 1.5 mm; group 2: 15 +/- 1.5 mm; group 3: 20 +/- 1.5 mm. the pregnancy rate higher in group 2 and 3 .Again in 2015 the same finding were found by Kwon et al 45, Francoet al 200444 in a randomized controlled study found no difference in implantation rate and pregnancy rate when the embryo was placed in  the upper vs lower half of the endometrial cavity . while Kwon et  al 201545 found no difference whether it was put  2 cm from the fundus vs the uterine cavity midpoint .

Abdelmassih et al 200747studied the effect of introducing the outer sheath inside the cavity and found that leaving the sheath outside the internal os increases the pregnancy rate.


6. Antibiotics before embryo transfer

● It is not recommended to prescribe antibiotics with embryo transfer. (conditional  recommendation - moderate grade evidence )49.

350 patients were randomized  by  Brook et al 2006 48 to receive either prophylactic antibiotics or no antibiotics. The antibiotic used was amoxicillin and clavulanic acid on the day before and the day of transfer. The catheter tips were cultured after the transfer. While the antibiotics significantly reduced catheter contamination rates, the clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups were not different.

Kroon et  al 201249 performed systematic review and found no additional data to  justify using antibiotic therapy before transfer with respect to increasing the life birth rate.

In women with symptoms of infection, it is recommended to perform specific microbiological testing and take appropriate actions 50.


7.  Bed rest after transfer

Bed rest is not recommended after embryo transfer as it does not increase pregnancy rates (Strong recommendation- high grade evidence) 51,52.

Meta Analysis included 14 studies, none of them showed any benefit of bed rest of any duration. Three RCTs between 1997 and 2004 included 712 patients randomized to different periods of bed rest and showed no benefit of any of the following durations: 1 hour vs 24 hours (N1⁄4378), 20 minutes vs 24 hours (N1⁄4182), and immediate ambulation vs 30 minutes (N1⁄4152) .51

In contrast to the studies that have shown no benefit, one well-designed recent RCT demonstrated possible harm . Two hundred-forty patients undergoing their first IVF cycle were randomized to either 10 minutes of bed rest or immediate ambulation. This study demonstrated that the live-birth rates were significantly (P=.02) higher in the no bed rest group (56.7%) when compared to 10 minutes of rest (41.6%)52.


8. Removing mucus from the cervical canal

▪  No enough evidence to recommend routine removal of cervical mucous from the cervix before embryo transfer (conditional recommendation -very low grade evidence ) 53,55

Removing the cervical mucus might prevent clogging of the catheter tip , retraction of the embryos or displacing the mucous inside the uterine cavity which might affect the implantation . However manipulating the cervix can increase uterine contractility which decreases implantation 53,55.

Moini et al 2011 53did a randomized trial on mucous aspiration prior to ET. Five hundred patients were included and a significant difference was found both in the pregnancy rate and delivery rate (39vs 22% and 33.6 vs 17.4).However Craciunas et al 2014 54 compiled eight RCTs involving 1,715 women which were systematically analyzed. A meta-analysis from the available moderate to low quality trials provides very little evidence of an overall benefit of cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer for women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

A Cochrane review on cervical mucous flushing prior to ET by Derks et al 2009 did not find any improvement in pregnancy rate with flushing55.


9. Timing to remove the catheter after deposition of the embryos.

▪  There is No specific time to recommend removal of   the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer. (conditional recommendation-moderate grade evidence) 56

After deposition of the embryo there is evidence from one randomized trial that there is no difference between immediate withdrawal or waiting for 30 seconds  (Martiniz et al 2001)56.

Similarly cohort study by Soroga et al 201057 found no difference between waiting 60 seconds versus immediate withdrawal