Annex 1: Guideline development contributors and participants, with their declarations of interests
Editorial Independence:
▪️ This guideline was developed without any external funding.
▪️ All the guideline development group members have declared that they do not have any competing interests.
Tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, and deep neck space infections in England: the case for a new guideline for surgical and non-surgical management |
Controversies in the management of deep neck space infection in children: an evidence‐based review |
|
9 |
7 |
Credibility |
7 |
7 |
Observability |
7 |
9 |
Relevance |
8 |
8 |
Relative advantage |
8 |
7 |
Easy to install/understand |
7 |
7 |
Testability |
7 |
8 |
Compatibility |
53 |
63 |
Total score |
1. Assessment of content table:
Controversies in the management of deep neck space infection in children: an evidence‐based review had the highest scores.
2. Assessment of quality (CPG Appraisal tool):
Controversies in the management of deep neck space infection in children: an evidence‐based review |
Tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, and deep neck space infections in England: the case for a new guideline for surgical and non-surgical management |
|
1.Transparency |
A |
A |
2. Conflict of interest |
A |
A |
3. Development group |
A |
B |
4. Systematic review |
A |
A |
5. Grading of evidence |
A |
B |
6.Recommendations |
A |
B |
7. External review |
A |
B |
8.Updating |
A |
C |
3.Assessment of Currency table:
No |
Guideline Name |
Year of publication |
The organization |
Age demo-graphy |
1 |
Controversies in the management of deep neck space infection in children: an evidence‐based review |
2017 |
Clin Otolaryngol
. |
Adults and children |
2 |
Tonsillitis, tonsillectomy, and deep neck space infections in England: the case for a new guideline for surgical and non-surgical management |
2021 |
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
|
Adults and children |
No statements of the original guidline were modified, added nor omitted.