البحث الشامل غير مفعل
تخطى إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

Non-Clinical Interventions to reduce overall cesarean sections

"last update: 8 February 2024"  

- References

1. El-Zanaty FH, Sayed HAA, Zaky HHM, Way AA. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 1992 [Internet]. National Population Council/Egypt and Macro International; 1993. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR48/FR48.pdf

2.  Ministry of Health and Population/Egypt, El-Zanaty and Associates/Egypt, ICF International. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2014 [Internet]. Cairo, Egypt: Ministry of Health and Population and ICF International; 2015. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR302/FR302.pdf

3. Berghella V. Cesarean birth: Postoperative care, complications, and long-term sequelae. [cited 2023 Jul 7]; Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/cesarean-birth-postoperative-care-complications-and-long-term-sequelae

4.  Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med. 2021 Jan 26;49(1):5–16.

5. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Brozek J, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Mustafa RA, Manja V, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;81:101–10.

6. WHO Recommendations Non-Clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Sections [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 7]. (WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532672/

7. World Health Organization. WHO handbook for guideline development [Internet]. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/145714

8. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2018 Sep 28 [cited 2023 Jul 7];2018(9). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3

9. Betran A, Torloni M, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu A, the WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section, Aleem H, et al. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;123(5):667–70.

10. UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015 [cited 2023 Jul 9]; Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1654217

11. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. The Global Rating Scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 May;65(5):526–34.

12. Chaillet N, Dumont A, Abrahamowicz M, Pasquier JC, Audibert F, Monnier P, et al. A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates in Quebec. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1710–21.

13. Lomas J. Opinion Leaders vs Audit and Feedback to Implement Practice Guidelines: Delivery After Previous Cesarean Section. JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2202.

14.  Althabe F, Belizán JM, Villar J, Alexander S, Bergel E, Ramos S, et al. Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2004 Jun;363(9425):1934–40.

15.  Liang WH, Yuan CC, Hung JH, Yang ML, Yang MJ, Chen YJ, et al. Effect of peer review and trial of labor on lowering cesarean section rates. J Chin Med Assoc JCMA. 2004 Jun;67(6):281–6.

16. Mohammadi S, Källestål C, Essén B. Clinical audits: A practical strategy for reducing cesarean section rates in a general hospital in Tehran, Iran. J Reprod Med. 2012;57(1–2):43–8.

17.  Scarella A, Chamy V, Sepúlveda M, Belizán JM. Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Feb;154(2):136–40.