Global searching is not enabled.
Skip to main content

Pure-Tone Air-Conduction and Bone-Conduction Threshold Audiometry with and without Masking in Adults and Older Children (ECPG)

"last update: 26 August 2024"  

- Annexes

Editorial Independence:

● This guideline was developed without any external funding.

●  All the guideline development group members have declared that they do not have any competing interests.

Annex 1: Guideline Flowchart   

        

Annex 2: Tables of appraisal of selected guidelines: Currency (table 1), Content (table 2) and Quality (table 3) of the selected guidelines.


1.Assessment of Currency (table 1): 

No

Guideline name

Organization

Date of publication

Date of review

Age Demography

1

Pure-tone air-conduction and bone- conduction threshold audiometry with and  without masking

British Society of Audiology

 

January 2017

 

January 2022

Adult and old children

2

Pure-tone air-conduction and bone- conduction threshold audiometry with and  without masking

British Society of Audiology

August 2018

2023

Adult and old children

3

ASHA 2005

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)

2005

-------

Adult

4

French Society of ENT (SFORL) guidelines (short version): Audiometry in adults and children

 

French Society of ENT (SFORL)

Jaunuary 2018

 

Adult and Children


2- Assessment of Quality (Table 2)

Assessment of quality

Domain

BSA 2017

BSA 2018

ASHA 2005

SFORL 2018

Transparency

A

A

A

A

Conflict of interest

B

B

B

B

Development group

B

B

B

B

Systemic Review

B

B

B

C

Grading of evidence

D

D

B

D

Recommendation

B

B

B

B

External Review

A

A

A

A

Updating

A

A

C

B


3- Content (Table 3) 

Content

Criteria

BSA2017

BSA2018

ASHA 2005

SFORL 2018

Credibility

 

IBSA 2011

9

BSA 2011

9

ANSI2004

9

7

Observability

 

9

9

8

5

Relevance

 

9

9

8

6

Relative

Advantage

9

8

7

6

Easy to install and understand

9

9

7

7

Compatibility

 

9

9

7

6

Testability

 

9

9

9

6

Total

63

62

55

43


Annex 3: The risks and benefits of added and/or modified statements.

Original statement

The statement to be adapted:

Action

Benefits

Risk/Harm

 

1- 3000 and 6000 Hz may be required in cases of high frequency hearing loss

 

 

 

 

3000 and 6000 Hz should be done in all cases.

Detection of v dips at these 2 frequencies facilitates early detection of suspected cases of retrocochlear lesions, very important in noise induced hearing loss, and in tinnitus patients.

Increase the examination time.

 

2- Audiometric symbols

 Not including the masked air conduction symbols


 According to ASHS, 1990


 

 

The original in the document did not involve the masked air conduction symbols.

 

 

No harm

 

 3- Audiometric descriptors and configurations

Mild hearing loss:

21-40

 

Moderate hearing loss:

41-70

 

Severe hearing loss:

71-95

Profound hearing loss:

excess of 95

 

Four audiometric descriptors are given. These are based on the average of the pure-tone a-c hearing threshold levels at 250, 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz


Mild

26-40

moderate

41-55

Moderately severe

56-70

severe

71-90

profound

More than 91

 

●     Five audiometric descriptors are given According to ASHA, 2015 but in contrary to ASHA 2015, we adopt the average of pure tone hearing threshold at frequencies (250Hz, 500 Hz, 1KHz, 2KHz, and 4KHz) instead of 250Hz to 2KHz.

●  We also clarify that as described previously by Northern and Downs (2002) that 15 dB HL as the upper limit for normal hearing for children between 2 and 18 years of age

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More precise and widely used

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No harm

 

Averages do not imply any particular configuration of hearing loss and do not exclude additional terms (e.g. profound high-frequency hearing loss) being used.

 

The configuration, or shape, of the hearing loss refers to the degree and pattern of hearing loss across frequencies.

For example, a hearing loss that only affects the high tones would be described as a high-frequency loss.

On the other hand, if only the low frequencies were affected, the configuration would show poorer hearing for low tones and better hearing for high tones. Some hearing loss configurations are flat, indicating the same amount of hearing loss for low and high tones (ASHA, 2015).

Moreover, if there is V dip at certain frequency, it should be described.

We adapt the following table for the configuration description: quoted from Schlauch, R. S., & Nelson, P. B. (2009).

 

Flat

<5-dB rise or fall per octave

Gradually falling

5- to 12-dB increase per octave

Sharply falling

15- to 20-dB increase per octave

Precipitously falling

Flat or gradually sloping, then threshold increasing at 25 dB or more per octave

Rising

>5-dB decrease in threshold per octave

Peaked

20-dB or greater loss at the extreme frequencies, but not at the mid frequencies

Trough

20-dB or greater loss in the mid frequencies (1,000–2,000 Hz),

but not at the extreme frequencies (500 or 4,000 Hz)

Notched

20-dB or greater loss at one frequency

with complete or near-complete recovery at adjacent octave frequencies

More precise and more informative.

 

No harm

 

4- Guidelines of PTA in outbreaks:

No statements were described in BSA as how to deal in highly infectious circumstances as in COVID 9

During The terrible COVID 19 outbreak, we adapt the American Academy Guidelines that were prescribed for vestibular testing during COVID with slight modification.


Very beneficial to protect the health provider staff and also the personnel seeking the PTA

Time consuming and costly.