Skip to main content

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (ECPG)

Site: EHC | Egyptian Health Council
Course: Otorhinolaryngology, Audiovestibular & Phoniatrics Guidelines
Book: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (ECPG)
Printed by: Guest user
Date: Monday, 23 December 2024, 9:06 PM

Description

"last update: 27 August 2024"  

- Acknowledgements

Chief Editor: Reda Kamel1

General Secretary: Ahmed Ragab2

General Coordinator: Baliegh Hamdy3

Scientific Board: Ashraf Khaled,4 Mohamed Ghonaim,5 Mahmoud Abdel Aziz,6 Tarek Ghanoum,7 Mahmoud Yousef8

Audiology Executive Manager: Iman El-Danasoury9

Assembly board: Nagwa Hazzaa,9 Mohamed El Badry,10 Nahla Gad,11 Lamees El-Amragy9

Grading Board (In alphabetical order)

Adel Abdel Maksoud,9 Abeir Dabbous,7 Iman El Adawi,12 Iman El-Danasoury,9 Tarek ElDessouky,13 Mai El Gohary,14 Wafaa El Kholy,9 Trandil El Mehallawi,15 Enass Sayed,16 Reham Elshafei,17 Amira El Shennawy,7 Naema Ismail,12 Enaas Kolkaila,15 Rabab Koura,13 Salwa Mahmoud,14 Radwa Mahmoud,18 Soha Mekki,11 Iman Mostafa,13 Mona Mourad,19 Abir Omara,14 Mohamed Salama,16 Hesham Sami,10 Hesham Taha,9 Somia Tawfik,9 Ragaey Youssef13

Reviewers: Mohamed Shabana,7 Alaa Abou-Setta,20 Hossam A.Ghaffar21,Mohammed A. Gomaa22, Sayed Sobhy Sayed23

1Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 2Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Menoufia University, 3Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/Minia University, 4Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Bani- Suef University, 5Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Mansoura University, 6Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/Tanta University, 7Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 8Phoniatrics Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Ain Shams University, 9Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of   Medicine/ Ain Shams University,10 Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Minia University, 11Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Zagazig University, 12Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Al Azhar University, 13Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Bani-Suef University, 14Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department/ Hearing and Speech Institute, 15Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Tanta University, 16Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Assiut University, 17Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Fayoum University,18Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Banha University, 19Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Alexandria University, 20Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Suez Canal University, 21Audiovestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Helwan University.22 Professor of  Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine /Minia University. 23 Professor of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine/ Fayoum University

Sincere thanks extend to the secretaries: Samar Hussein and Eman Ragab, as well as the editor: Mohamed Salah


- Abbreviations

AAO-HNS                        American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery

BPPV                                Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

BPPN                                Benign paroxysmal positional nystagmus

CRP                                   Canalith repositioning procedure

MD                                    Meniere’s Disease

VR                                     Vestibular rehabilitation 

- Executive Summary

Clinicians should diagnose posterior semicircular canal BPPV when vertigo associated with torsional, up beating nystagmus is provoked by the Dix-Hall pike maneuver, performed by bringing the patient from an upright to supine position with the head turned 45° to one side and neck extended 20° with the affected ear down. The maneuver should be repeated with the opposite ear down if the initial maneuver is negative. (Strong recommendation)

If the patient has a history compatible with BPPV and the Dix-Hallpike test exhibits horizontal or no nystagmus, the clinician should perform, or refer to a clinician who can perform, a supine roll test to assess for lateral semicircular canal BPPV. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should differentiate, or refer to a clinician who can differentiate, BPPV from other causes of imbalance, dizziness, and vertigo. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should assess patients with BPPV for factors that modify management, by the recommended repositioning maneuvers, including impaired mobility or balance, central nervous system disorders, a lack of home support, and/or increased risk for falling. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should not obtain radiographic imaging in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV. (Strong recommendation against)

Clinicians should not order laboratory vestibular testing in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing. Vestibular testing may be ordered in case of recurrence, persistence of complaint after repositioning manoeuvre or in the presence of atypical nystagmus (Conditional recommendation against)

Clinicians should treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure. Epley’s or Semont’s are equivocally effective for posterior canal BPPV. Semont’s is recommended in cupulolithiasis than Epley’s. (Strong recommendation)

The barbecue roll manoeuvre or Gufoni manoeuvre appear moderately effective for the geotropic form of lateral semi-circular canal BPPV. (Conditional recommendation)

Clinicians may not routinely recommend post procedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV. Post procedural postrural restriction might be recommended in selected cases as in   failure (or repeated failure) of the repositioning maneuvers, recurrent cases, or cases associated with other vestibular pathology as MD or vestibular Migraine. (Conditional recommendation against)

1-2 sessions would resolve the condition in 87-100% of patients. A minority would require a 3ed trial. Otherwise persistent BPPV is suspected. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should start with CRP (or modified) even in those patients who are very obese; have severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient’s preference. In the latter case patients should be instructed to avoid activities that may increase the risk of falls until symptoms resolve. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians may offer observation with follow up only if there is difficulty in performing successful manoeuvre after trials in some patients as : very obese; severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient’s preference not to repeat the manoeuvre. (Strong recommendation)

VR should be considered an option in the treatment of BPPV rather than a recommended first-line treatment modality. Home based Brandt-Daroff exercises is indicated in patients with persistent dizziness or imbalance after successful CRP or patients who refuse CRP.A more comprehensive customized VR program is indicated in patients with other vestibular pathology or with comorbid impairments that require balance rehabilitation specially in elderly. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should not treat BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications such as antihistamines and/ or benzodiazepines. Exceptions: Prior to CRP in patients with severe nausea and/or vomiting, or patients previously manifested severe nausea and/or vomiting during testing. (Strong recommendation against)

Clinicians should reassess patients within an initial period of observation following the canalith repositioning procedure (40 minutes up to one week) to document resolution, need for repetition of CRP session or persistence of symptoms. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should evaluate, or refer to a clinician who can evaluate, patients with persistent symptoms for unresolved BPPV and/or underlying peripheral vestibular or central nervous system disorders. (Strong recommendation)

Clinicians should educate patients regarding the impact of BPPV on their safety, the potential for disease recurrence, and the importance of follow-up. (Strong recommendation)


- Introduction, scope and audience

➡️ Introduction

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a very common cause for dizziness and vertigo in the general population. It is estimated that over one third of dizzy patients referred to a dizziness clinic have BPPV. Many maneuvers were proposed for treatment of BPPV. Persistent symptoms for unresolved BPPV after successful maneuver or atypical pattern of nystagmus should raise the index of suspicion.

➡️ Scope

The scope of the guideline is the diagnosis and management of BPPV. The guideline is required to increase the skills of all target specialists for proper diagnosis of cases of positional vertigo and avoid faulty diagnosis

➡️ Target audience

Audiovestibular physicians

Otolorhinolaryngologist

Neurologist

Physical Therapist


- Methods

Methods of development

➡️Stakeholder Involvement: Individuals who were involved in the development process. Included the above-mentioned Audiology Chief Manager, Audiology Executive Manager, Assembly Board, Grading Board and Reviewing Board.

Information about target population experiences were not applicable for this topic.

The adaptation cycle passed over: set-up phase, adaptation phase (Search and screen, assessment: currency, content, quality & /decision/selection) and finalization phase that included revision and external reviewing.

➡️ Search Method

Electronic database searched:

Pubmed, Medline, and Medscape

➡️ Keywords

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; Otoconia; Utricle; repositioning maneuvers

➡️ Time period searched: June 2015 to December 2018. 

➡️ Results

Four national audio-vestibular experts reviewed the guidelines available.  Guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (2018) gained the highest scores as regards currency, contents and quality

It was graded GRADE by twenty six experts and reviewed by three expert reviewers to improve quality, gather feedback on draft recommendations.

The external review was done through a rating scale as well as open-ended questions.

➡️Setting: Primary, secondary and tertiary care centers & hospitals, and related specialties.


Interpretation of strong and conditional recommendations for an intervention

Audience

Strong recommendation

Conditional recommendation

Patients

Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action; only a small proportion would not.

Formal decision aides are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.

Most individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not

Clinicians

Most individuals should receive the intervention.

Adherence to the recommendation could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator.

Different choices will be appropriate for individual patients, who will require assistance in arriving at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aides may be useful in helping individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.

Policymakers

The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations.

Policy-making will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders.

 

WHO handbook for guideline development – 2nd ed.

Chapter 10, page 129


The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to Decision frameworks 

(GRADE Working Group 2013)

Grade

Definition

High

 

We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

Moderate

 

We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different

Low

 

Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

Very Low

 

We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect


- Recommendations

The  following  statements  and  flowchart  were  adapted from the Guidelines from American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery  which received the highest scores as regards the currency, contents, and quality. 

Recommendations statements



 Statement topic

 Egyptian Recommendation

 Evidence Quality

 Strength of

Recommendations

Study type

Reference

 

 

1.Diagnosis of posterior semicircular canal BPPV


Clinicians should diagnose posterior semicircular canal BPPV when vertigo associated with torsional, up beating nystagmus is   45° to one side and neck extended 20° with the affected ear down. The maneuver should be repeated with the opposite ear down if the initial maneuver is negative.

 

 

 

Moderate

 

 

 

Strong Recommendation

 

 

Diagnostic study

with minor limitation

Honrubia V, Baloh RW, Harris MR, et al. Paroxysmal positional

vertigo syndrome. Am J Otol. 1999;20:465-470.

2.Diagnosis of lateral (horizontal) semicircular canal BPPV


If the patient has a history compatible with BPPV and the Dix-Hallpike test exhibits horizontal or no nystagmus, the clinician should perform, or refer to a clinician who can perform, a supine roll test to assess for lateral semicircular canal BPPV.

 

 

Moderate

 

 

Strong Recommendation

 

Diagnostic study with minor limitation

Baloh RW, Jacobson K, Honrubia V. Horizontal semicircular

canal variant of benign positional vertigo. Neurology.

1993;43:2542-2549.

3.Differential diagnosis


Clinicians should differentiate, or refer to a clinician who can differentiate, BPPV from other causes of imbalance, dizziness, and vertigo.

 

Low

 

Strong Recommendation

 

Observational study

Kentala E, Rauch SD. A practical assessment algorithm

for diagnosis of dizziness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.

2003;128:54-59.

 

 

4.Modifying factors


Clinicians should assess patients with BPPV for factors that modify management ,by the recommended repositioning maneuvers, including impaired mobility or balance, central nervous system disorders, a lack of home support, and/or increased risk for falling.

 

 

Low

 

 

Conditional Recommendation

 

 

Observational study

Lawson J, Johnson I, Bamiou DE, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional

vertigo: clinical characteristics of dizzy patients referred to

a Falls and Syncope Unit. QJM. 2005;98:357-364.

5.Radiographic testing


Clinicians should not obtain radiographic imaging in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV.

Low

Strong Recommendation

(against)

Observational study

Turski P, Seidenwurm D, Davis P; American College of Radiology.

Expert Panel on Neuroimaging: Vertigo and Hearing Loss. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2006.

 

 

 

6.Vestibular testing


Clinicians should not order laboratory vestibular testing in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing.   Vestibular testing may be ordered in case of recurrence, persistence of complaint after repositioning manoeuvre or in the presence of atypical nystagmus .

 

 

 

Low

 

 


Conditional Recommendation (against)

 

 

 

Observational study

Baloh RW, Honrubia V, Jacobson K. Benign positional vertigo:

clinical and oculographic features in 240 cases. Neurology.

1987;37:371-378

 

7.Repositioning procedures as initial therapy (a)


Clinicians should treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure. Epley’s or Semont’s are equivocally effective for posterior canal BPPV. Semont’s is recommended in cupulolithiasis than Epley’s.

 High

 Strong Recommendation

Well designed RCT  and systemic review with meta-analysis

Hilton MP, Pinder DK. The Epley (canalith repositioning)

manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD003162.

 

Prim-Espada MP, De Diego-Sastre JI, Pérez-Fernández E.

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of Epley’s manoeuvre in benign

paroxysmal positional vertigo. Neurologia. 2010;25:295-299.

8.Repositioning procedures as initial therapy (b)


The barbecue roll maneuver or Gufoni maneuver appear moderately effective for the geotropic form of lateral semicircular canal BPPV.

 

Moderate

 

Conditional Recommendation

 

RCT

Kim JS, Oh S-Y, Lee S-H, et al. Randomized clinical trial for

geotropic horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Neurology. 2012;79:700-707.

 

 

 

9.Post procedural restrictions


Clinicians may not routinely recommend post procedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV. Post procedural postrural restriction might be recommended in selected cases as in   failure (or repeated failure) of the repositioning maneuvers, recurrent cases, or cases associated with other vestibular pathology as MD or vestibular Migraine.

High

Conditional Recommendation (against)

Diagnostic study with minor limitation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well-designed RCT

Roberts RA, Gans RE, DeBoodt JL, et al. Treatment of benign

paroxysmal positional vertigo: necessity of postmaneuver

patient restrictions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:357-366.

 

Balikci HH, Ozbay I. Effects of postural restriction after modified

Epley maneuver on recurrence of benign paroxysmal positional

vertigo. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41:428-431.

10.Number of CRP repetitions


1-2 sessions would resolve the condition in 87-100% of patients. A minority would require a 3ed trial. Otherwise persistent BPPV is suspected.

 Low

 Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Kentala E, Pyykkö I. Vertigo in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2000;543:20-22.

 

11.If there is difficulty in performing successful maneuver


Clinicians should start with CRP (or modified) even in those patients who are very obese; have severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient’s preference. In the latter case patients should be instructed to avoid activities that may increase the risk of falls until symptoms resolve.

  Low

 Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Kerber KA. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: opportunities

squandered. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1343:106-112.

 

12.Observation as initial therapy


Clinicians may offer observation with follow up only if there is difficulty in performing successful maneuver after trials in some patients as : very obese; severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient’s preference not to repeat the maneuver.

 Low

 Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Kerber KA. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: opportunities

squandered. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1343:106-112.

 

 

 Statement topic

 Egyptian Recommendation

 Evidence

Quality

 Strength of Recommendations

The statement is based up on:

 

 

 

 

13.Vestibular rehabilitation


VR should be considered an option in the treatment of BPPV rather than a recommended first-line treatment modality. Home based Brandt-Daroff exercises is indicated in patients with persistent dizziness or imbalance after successful CRP or patients who refuse CRP.A more comprehensive customized VR program is indicated in patients with other vestibular pathology or with comorbid impairments that require balance rehabilitation specially in elderly.

 

 

 

Moderate

 

 

 

Strong Recommendations




Systemic review

Hillier SL, Hollohan V. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral

peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2007;(4):CD005397.

 

 

14.Medical therapy


Clinicians should not treat BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications such as antihistamines and/ or benzodiazepines. Exceptions: Prior to CRP in patients with severe nausea and/or vomiting, or patients previously manifested severe nausea and/or vomiting during testing.

 

 

Moderate

 

Strong Recommendation (against)

Diagnostic study with minor limitation

Fujino A, Tokumasu K, Yosio S, et al. Vestibular training for

benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: its efficacy in comparison

with antivertigo drugs. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.

1994;120:497-504.

 

14.Outcome

assessment


Clinicians should reassess patients within an initial period of observation following the canalith repositioning procedure ( 40 minutes up to one week) to document resolution, need for repetition of CRP session or persistence of symptoms.

 

 

Very low

 

 

Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Sekine K, Imai T, Sato G, et al. Natural history of benign paroxysmal

positional vertigo and efficacy of Epley and Lempert

maneuvers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:529-533.

 

15.Evaluation of treatment failure


Clinicians should evaluate, or refer to a clinician who can evaluate, patients with persistent symptoms for unresolved BPPV and/or underlying peripheral vestibular or or central nervous system disorders.

 

Low

 

Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Buttner U, Helmchen C, Brandt T. Diagnostic criteria for central

versus peripheral positioning nystagmus and vertigo: a

review. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119:1-5.

 

16.Patient Education


Clinicians should educate patients regarding the impact of BPPV on their safety, the potential for disease recurrence, and the importance of follow-up.

 

Low

 

Strong Recommendation

Observational study

Brandt T, Dieterich M. Vestibular falls. J Vestib Res. 1993;3:3-14.

 


- Research needs

No need for new study to confirm our choice of statements


- Monitoring and evaluating the impact of the guideline

Monitoring/ Auditing Criteria

The audiovestibular physicians should:

       · Search for spontaneous nystagmus

       · Perform oculomotor tests (gaze, smooth pursuit, and saccading testing)

       · Perform Dix-Hallpike test and other positional tests properly

       · Proper diagnosis of the side (right vs left), canal affected, and type of BPPV (canalolithiasis vs. Cupulolithiais).


- Updating of the guideline

Updating Procedure:

Any recommendation of this guideline will be updated when new evidence that could potentially impact the current evidence base for this recommendation is identified. If no new reports or information are identified for a particular recommendation, the recommendation will be revalidated. The focus will be on recommendations supported by very-low- or low certainty evidence and where new recommendations or a change in the published recommendations may be needed.


- References

1.     Brandt T, Daroff RB. Physical therapy for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106:484-485.

2.     Brandt T, Steddin S, Daroff RB. Therapy for benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo, revisited. Neurology. 1994;44:796-800.

3.     Gordon CR, Shupak A, Spitzer O, et al. Nonspecific vertigo with normal otoneurological examination: the role of vestibular laboratory tests. J Laryngol Otol. 1996;110:1133-1137.

4.     Kentala E, Pyykkö I. Vertigo in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2000;543:20-22.

5.     Oghalai JS, Manolidis S, Barth JL, et al. Unrecognized benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in elderly patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:630-634.

6.     Casani AP, Vannucci G, Fattori B, et al. The  treatment of horizontal canal positional vertigo: our experience in 66 cases. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:172-178.

7.     Cohen HS, Kimball KT. Treatment variations on the Epley maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Am J Otolaryngol. 2004;25:33-37.

8.     Gamiz MJ, Lopez-Escamez JA. Health- related quality of life in patients over sixty years     old       with     benign            paroxysmal positional vertigo. Gerontology. 2004;50:82-86.

9.     Prokopakis EP, Chimona   T, Tsagournisakis M, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: 10- year experience in treating 592 patients with canalith repositioning procedure. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1667-1671.

10.  White J, Savvides P, Cherian Net al. Canalith repositioning for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26:704-710.

11.  Cakir BO, Ercan I, Cakir ZA, et al. What is the true incidence of horizontal semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134:451-454.

12.  Phillips JS, FitzGerald JE, Bath AP. The role of the vestibular assessment. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:1 212-1215.

13.  Breverna MV, Bertholon BP, Brand TC, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Diagnostic criteria. Consensus document of the Committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society Journal of Vestibular Research 2015;25:105–117.

14.  Howick, J, Chalmers, I, Glasziou; OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford           2011    levels   of            evidence. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed October 22, 2015.

15.  McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1):CD005397.

16.   Takao I, Noriaki T, Tetsuo I, et al. Classification, diagnostic criteria and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Committee for Standards in Diagnosis of Japan Society for Equilibrium Research Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44:1–6.

17.  Bhattacharyya N , Gubbels SP , Schwartz SR, et al.Clinical practical guidelines : Benign paroxysmal      positional vertigo (update).Otolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery 2017, Vol. 156(3S) S1–S47.Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update); AAO-HNS Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(3_suppl): S1-S47.

18.  Pérez-Vázquez P, Franco-Gutiérrez V, Soto-Varela A, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Managementof Benign Paroxysmal     Positional Vertigo. Otoneurology Committee of Spanish Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Consensus Document Acta Otorinolaringol Esp.2018;69(6):345-36


- Annexes

 Editorial Independence:

   ▪️ This guideline was developed without any external funding.

   ▪️  All the guideline development group members have declared that they do not have any competing interests.

Annex 1: Guideline Flowchart 



Annex 2: Tables of appraisal of selected guidelines: Currency (table 1), Content (table 2) and Quality (table 3) of the selected guidelines.

Table 1: Currency



Table 2: Content

CRITERIA

American Academy ORL-HNS

Bárány Society

Spanish ORL-HNS Consensus

Japan Society for Equilibrium Research

Credibility

9/9

5.4/9

7.2/9

3.6/9

Observability

9/9

7.2/9

3.6/9

3.6/9

Relevance

9/9

7.2/9

7.2/9

5.4/9

Relative advantage

7.2/9

7.2/9

7.2/9

7.2/9

Easy to install and understand

9/9

9/9

7.2/9

5.4/9

Compatibility

9/9

9/9

9/9

9/9

Testability

9/9

9/9

9/9

9/9

Total

61.2

54

50.4

43.2


Table 3: Quality

Domain

AAO-HNS

Bárány Society

Spanish ORL- HNS Consensus

Japan Society for Equilibrium Research

1. Transparency

A

A

C

C

2. Conflict of interest

A

A

B

B

3. Development group

A

C

C

C

4. Systematic review

A

B

A

B

5. Grading of evidence

A

B

B

B

6. Recommendations

A

C

C

C

7. External review

A

A

NR

B

8. Updating

B

B

B

B


Annex 3: The risks and benefits of added and/or modified statements

Statement topic

Original statement

The statement action to be adapted

Benefits

Risk/Harm

 

 

 

 

Vestibular testing

Clinicians should not order laboratory vestibular testing in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing.

Clinicians should not order laboratory vestibular testing in a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing. Vestibular testing may be ordered in case of recurrence, persistence of complaint after repositioning maneuver or in the presence of atypical nystagmus

Diagnosis and treatment of possible causes of positional vertigo other than BPPV

Cost of vestibular testing

Repositioning

procedures as initial

therapy for posterior canal (a)

Clinicians should treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure

Clinicians should treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure. Epley or Semont are equivocally effective  for post.canal BPPV

High value ascribed to prompt

resolution of symptoms and the ease with which the

CRP may be performed

No serious adverse

events reported in controlled randomized trials

Repositioning

procedures as initial therapy for lateral canal (b)

Not reported

the barbecue roll maneuver or Gufoni maneuver appear moderately effective for the geotropic form of lateral semicircular canal BPPV

Helps in resolution of patients symptoms

None

 

 

 

Post procedural restrictions

Clinicians may not routinely recommend post procedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV.

Clinicians may not routinely recommend post procedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV. Post procedural postrural restriction might be recommended in selected cases as in   failure (or repeated failure) of the repositioning maneuvers, recurrent cases, or cases associated with other vestibular pathology as MD or vestibular Migraine.

Help patients to tolerate symptoms till complete recovery

Possible musculoskeletal discomfort and cost of cervical collars

Number of CRP repetitions

Not reported

1-2 sessions would resolve the condition in 87-100% of patients. A minority would require a 3ed trial. Otherwise persistent BPPV is suspected.

Help the clinician to search for causes of resolution failure

Cost of investigations

If there is difficulty in performing successful maneuver

Not reported

Clinicians should start with CRP (or modified) even in those patients who are very obese; have severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient’s preference. In the latter case patients should be instructed to avoid activities that may increase the risk of falls until symptoms resolve.

Faster recovery and resolution of BPPV

Patient discomfort and difficulty of performing the maneuver  

 Observation as initial therapy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinicians may offer observation with follow up as initial management for patients with BPPV

Clinicians may offer observation with follow up only if there is difficulty in performing successful maneuver after trials in some patients as : very obese; severe cervical or lumber discs; or upon patient's preference not to repeat the maneuver

Avoidance of increased risks of falls; the use of vestibular suppressants with their known side effects

Prolonged symptoms compared with other interventions that may expose patients to increased risks for falls or lost days of work; indirect costs of delayed resolution compared with other measures

 

 

 

Vestibular rehabilitation

The clinician may offer VR in the treatment of BPPV

VR should be considered an option in the treatment of BPPV rather than a recommended first-line treatment modality. Home based Brandt-Daroff exercises is indicated in patients with persistent dizziness or imbalance after successful CRP or patients who refuse CRP.A more comprehensive customized VR program is indicated in patients with other vestibular pathology or with comorbid impairments that require balance rehabilitation specially in elderly.

Reduce patient symptom in the mentioned cases

None for home-based exercise.

Cost if formal VR program is recommended

Medical therapy

Clinicians should not routinely treat BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications

such as antihistamines and/or benzodiazepines

Clinicians should not  treat BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications

such as antihistamines and/or benzodiazepines. Exceptions: Severely symptomatic patients refusing other treatment options and patients requiring prophylaxis

for CRP

Avoidance of adverse effects from, or

medication interactions with, these medications;

prevention of decreased diagnostic sensitivity from

vestibular suppression during performance of the

Dix-Hallpike maneuvers

None

Outcome assessment

Clinicians should reassess patients within 1 month after an initial period of observation or treatment to document resolution or persistence of symptoms

Clinicians should reassess patients within time frame of 3 weeks following the canalith repositioning procedure to document resolution, need for repetition of CRP session  or persistence of symptoms

Confirming the success of the maneuver; avoidance of missing other versions of BPPV as multiple canals or central causes

None