Skip to main content

AUDIOLOGY Tinnitus

Site: EHC | Egyptian Health Council
Course: Otorhinolaryngology, Audiovestibular & Phoniatrics Guidelines
Book: AUDIOLOGY Tinnitus
Printed by: Guest user
Date: Monday, 23 December 2024, 10:27 PM

Description

"last update: 19 May 2024"  

- Acknowledgements

Chief Editor: Reda Kamel1

General Secretary: Ahmed Ragab2

General Coordinator: Baliegh Hamdy3

Scientific Board: Ashraf Khaled,4 Mohamed Ghonaim,5 Mahmoud Abdel Aziz,6 Tarek Ghanoum,7 Mahmoud Yousef8

Audiology Chief Manager: Tarek Ghannoun7

Audiology Executive Manager: Iman El-Danasoury9

Assembly Board: Mohamed Tarek Ghannoum,7 Abeir Osman Dabbous,7 Mohamed Moustafa Abdeltawwab10

Grading Board (In alphabetical order): Rafeek Mohamed Abdel-Kader,11 Iman Mostafa Basiouny,12 Mona El-Akkad,13, Mohamed El-Badry,11 Iman Sadek El-Danasoury,9 Tarek El-Dessouky,12 Amira Maged El-Shennawy,7 Nagwa Hazzaa,9 Naema Ismail,14 Enaas Kolkaila,15 Rabab Ahmed Koura,12 Radwa Mahmoud,16 Salwa Mahmoud,17 Soha Mekki,18 Mona Mourad,19 Nashwa Nada,15 Adel Abdel Maksoud Nassar,9 Reham Rafei,13 Fatma Mohammed Refat,11 Mostafa Aly Youssif20

Reviewing Board: Nadia Kamal,9 Osama Sobhy,19 Mohamed Salama Bakr21, Nevin Mohei Shalaby22 Omnia Ahmed Raafat23 Kareem Mohsen Moussa24, Dalia Salah Eldin Elmesidy24

Ministry of health ECPG steering committee: Reda Kamel1, Ahmed Ragab2, Mahmoud Abdelaziz6, Mohamed Elsheikh6, Sherif Guindi25, Ali Mahrous26, Louay Sharkawy1, Saad Elzayat27, Ahmed Abu Elwafa28, Iman El-Danasoury9, Mahmoud Yousef8, Samir Halim29, Ahmed Mustafa30, Ehab Seifein 30, Ashraf Lotfy31, Mohamed Eltokhy32, Tamer Azzam32

1Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 2Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Menoufia University, 3Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Minia University, 4Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Beni-Suef University, 5Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/Mansoura University, 6Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Tanta University, 7Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 8Phoniatrics Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Ain Shams University, 9Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Ain Shams University, 10Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Mansoura University, 11Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/Minia University, 12Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Beni-Suef University, 13Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Fayoum University, 14Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Al Azhar University, 15Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Tanta University, 16Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Benha University, 17Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department/ Hearing and Speech Institute, 18Audio-vestibular Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Zagazig University, 19Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Alexandria University, 20Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Sohag University, 21Audio-vestibular Medicine Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Assiut University, 22 Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 23Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University, 24Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Cairo University. 25Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Fayoum University, 26Otorhinolaryngology Dep. Faculty of Medicine/Al Azhar University, 27Otorhinolaryngology Dep. Faculty of Medicine/Kafr El Shiekh University, 28 Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Assiut University, 29Otorhinolaryngology Department Mataria Teaching Hospital, ‎‎30Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine/ Hearing and Speech Institute, 31Otorhinolaryngology Department Secretariat of the Ministry of Defense, ‎‎32Otorhinolaryngology Department Ministry of Interior Medical Services Sector.

Sincere thanks also extend to the secretaries: Samar Hussein and Eman Ragab, as well as the editor: Mohamed Salah.


- Acronyms and Abbreviations

ABR           Auditory brainstem responses

BIH            Benign intracranial hypertension

CBC          complete blood count

CBT           Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

CBT4T        Cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus

CPG          Clinical Practice Guideline

CR®          co- ordinated reset

CT             Computed tomography

GRADE      Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

HADS        Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

MEGT        Multidisciplinary European Guideline for Tinnitus: Diagnostics, Assessment, and Treatment

MRI           Magnetic Resonance Imaging

RCTs          randomized controlled trials.

rTMS          Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

tACS         Transcranial alternating current stimulation

tDCS         Transcranial direct current stimulation

TFI             Tinnitus Functional Index

THI            Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

THQ           Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire

TMJ           Temporomandibular joint

TQ             Tinnitus Questionnaire

TRQ           Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire

TRT            Tinnitus Retraining Therapy

TSI             Tinnitus Severity Index

TSQ           Tinnitus Severity Questionnaire

VEMP        vestibular evoked myogenic potential

vHIT          Video Head Impulse Test

VNG    Videonystagmography

- Glossary

Definitions:

▪️ Tinnitus: Tinnitus involves the percept of a sound or sounds in the ear or head without an external source.

▪️ Pulsatile tinnitus: a sound in the ear or head without an external source, that is perceived as pulses. It is either vascular (synchronous with the heartbeat) and non-vascular. Vascular causes can be subcategorized into arterial or venous.

▪️ Subjective Tinnitus: Tinnitus heard by the patient only.

▪️ Objective Tinnitus: Tinnitus heard by the patient and the examiner.

▪️ Acute Tinnitus: Tinnitus of < 3 months duration.

▪️ Sub-acute Tinnitus: Tinnitus from 3-6 months duration.

▪️ Chronic Tinnitus: Tinnitus of >6months duration.

▪️ Habituation: a decreased response to a stimulus on repetitive stimulation.

▪️ Hyperacusis: oversensitivity to sounds, moderate level sounds perceived as loud, sounds others perceive as normal seem uncomfortably — and often unbearably loud. It’s also described as decreased sound tolerance or intolerance to loud sounds.


- Executive Summary

Tinnitus: Adapted Egyptian Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG)
Scope: The main goal of this guideline is to establish uniformity in the assessment and treatment of older children and adults with subjective tinnitus, for proper diagnosis of the possible cause of tinnitus to direct for proper treatment, and urgent referral if needed, and screening for the effects of tinnitus for proper management to improve the quality of life of tinnitus patients. The statements and flowchart of this guideline were adapted from the “Multidisciplinary European Guideline for Tinnitus: Diagnostics, Assessment, and Treatment (MEGT), (Cima et al.,2019
I. Diagnostics, assessments, and outcomes:
• Statement 1:
Ia. Minimum patient assessment:
2) A thorough physical assessment to exclude possible treatable (physical/medical) causes of tinnitus (Strong recommendation for).
3) A comprehensive diagnostic investigation: (pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, sound tolerance assessment, evaluation of the perceptional quality of tinnitus, tympanometry and acoustic reflex). (Strong recommendation for).
• Statement 2:
Ib. Further assessment by investigations Further assessment by AV investigations (ABR, OAE, VNG etc..) if clinically indicated or referrals (radiological/laboratory etc..) in special cases (Strong Recommendation for).
• Statement 3:
Ic. Consider Red Flags that need urgent referral for Assessment/Management  [1] (Strong Recommendation for).
Statement4:
Id. Recommendation for Assessment by questionnaires, to assess Tinnitus severity in terms of distress/impact (Strong Recommendation for).
II. Treatment options and referral pathways:
Statement 5:
IIa. Drug/pharmacological treatment for (acute tinnitus) (Strong Recommendation Against). But Drug/pharmacological treatment for acute sudden hearing loss (Strong Recommendation for). Drugs for the treatment of chronic tinnitus (Strong Recommendation Against). Drugs for the treatment of comorbidities associated with tinnitus (anxiety, depression) may need drug treatment. (Conditional Recommendation for).
•  Statement 6:
IIb. Hearing loss interventions: i) Cochlear implantation only for patients meeting the hearing loss criteria for candidacy (Strong Recommendation for). ii) Hearing aids for the management of tinnitus and hearing loss (Conditional Recommendation for) Combination hearing aids (including amplification and sound generator in the same device) (Conditional Recommendation for).
•  Statement 7:
IIc. Neurostimulation: Transcranial electrical (direct or alternating current). Transcranial Vagus or Invasive neurostimulation treatments (whether direct Vagus, cortical surface or deep brain neural stimulator) (Conditional Recommendation against), or Acoustic CR® Neuromodulation: (Conditional Recommendation for), or Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Conditional Recommendation for).
•  Statement 8:
IId. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) (Strong recommendation for).
•  Statement 9:
IIe. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) (Conditional Recommendation for).
•  Statement10 :
IIf. Sound therapy (including masking, music, environmental sound) for acute relief purposes (Conditional Recommendation for). Sound therapy for long-term use (Conditional recommendation against).
•  Statement11:
IIg. Dietary and alternative therapies (Strong recommendation Against).
•  Statement12:
IIh. Acupuncture (Conditional recommendation against).
•  Statement13:
III. Patient information and support (Strong Recommendation for).
•  Statement14:
IV. Measuring the Tinnitus Treatment Outcome: Measuring improvement: by the use of the same tinnitus questionnaire for assessment (Strong Recommendation for).

- Introduction, scope and audience

➡️Introduction and background
Tinnitus involves the percept of a sound or sounds in the ear or head without an external source. Tinnitus is a common auditory symptom, which may result in serious burden particularly when there are comorbidities. Tinnitus is a complex condition with a multifactorial origin. Tinnitus can present in many forms. Tinnitus can be any sound, but it is typically ringing, buzzing, hissing, or tonal. Some patients experience multiple sounds. For some the sound is persistent in quality and for others it changes. It can be constant or intermittent, and heard in one or both ears or inside the head. The sound can be perceived as either pulsatile or non-pulsatile. Pulsatile tinnitus can be either vascular or non-vascular. Tinnitus may be objective or subjective. It is necessary that clinicians identify all relevant tinnitus-related factors during tinnitus assessment. Treatment should be proposed based on an assessment that accounts for tinnitus as part of a complex system with intricate interactions between its constituent factors. A classification protocol should identify tinnitus clinically relevant patient profiles and offer a rational path to individualized treatment. Consensus on clinically relevant patient profiles, standard treatment, assessment, and referral trajectories has not been reached thus far. Additionally, inconsistent results in tinnitus studies, in experimental research, clinical trials, observational and cross-sectional research, represent a barrier to efficient standards in health care for tinnitus.

➡️Scope
The scope of this guideline is the establishment of uniformity in the assessment and treatment of older children and adults with subjective tinnitus, for proper diagnosis of the possible cause of tinnitus to direct for proper treatment, and urgent referral if needed, and screening for the effects of tinnitus for proper management to improve the quality of life of tinnitus patients.

➡️Target Audience
ENT and Audio-Vestibular Medicine Physicians, to be used to make and inform clinical decisions regarding management of older children and adults with subjective tinnitus and/or appropriate referral.

➡️Areas that are not covered

1. Managing hearing loss without tinnitus.

2. Managing sound sensitivities (Such as hyperacusis)

without tinnitus.

3. Managing underlying health conditions causing tinnitus.

4. Managing comorbid conditions such as depression and anxiety.

Expected benefit(s) or outcome(s): Diagnosis of the possible cause of tinnitus to direct for proper treatment, and urgent referral if needed, and screening for the effects of tinnitus for proper management to improve the quality of life of tinnitus patients.

- Methods

➡️ Methods of development

Stakeholder Involvement: Individuals who were involved in the development process. included the above-mentioned Audiology Chief Manager, Audiology Executive Manager, Assembly Board, Grading Board and Reviewing Board

Information about target population experiences, views and preferences were not applicable for this topic.

➡️Search method

Electronic database searched:

Pubmed, Medline, Egyptian Knowledge Bank, Medscape, WebMD, Google Scholar

➡️Keywords: 

The adaptation cycle passed over: set-up phase, adaptation phase (Search and screen, assessment: currency, content, quality & /decision/selection) and finalization phase that included revision and external reviewing. We used modified adapt process that consisted of three main phases, including planning and set-up, adaptation, and development of a final product.

➡️Time periods searched: from January 2010 to March 2020).

➡️Results

Three audio-vestibular medicine experts assessed the six tinnitus guidelines, where the multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment, 2019 [2], gained the highest scores as regards the currency, contents, and quality (Annex 2:  tables 1-3 [3]).

It was graded by 20 expert audio-vestibular medicine consultants and reviewed by 3 expert audio-vestibular medicine physicians reviewers, and 1 neurologist reviewer and 1 psychiatrist reviewer and 2 radiologists physicians reviewers, to improve quality, gather feedback on draft recommendations. The external review was done through a rating scale as well as open-ended questions.

➡️Intended Users of the guideline: ENT and Audio-Vestibular Medicine Physicians, to be used to make and inform clinical decisions regarding management of older children and adults with subjective tinnitus and/or appropriate referral.

Setting: Primary, secondary and tertiary care centers & hospitals, and related specialties.

N.B. Levels of evidence: Quality of evidence for the treatment methods (treatment elements or protocols, devices, or procedures) was guided by the (GRADE Working Group, 2013). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to Decision frameworks (Table 1)

N.B. Levels of recommendation: The recommendation level for each treatment method (Treatment elements or protocols, devices, or procedures) was guided by the GRADE system [3], Interpretation of strong and conditional recommendations for an intervention is shown in table (1).


Table (1): The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to Decision frameworks (GRADE Working Group 2013) [3]

Grade

Definition

High

We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

Moderate

We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different

Low

Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

Very Low

We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

[4] http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.


Table (2): Interpretation of strong and conditional recommendations for an intervention [5]

Audience

Strong recommendation

Conditional recommendation

Patients

Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action; only a small proportion would not.

Formal decision aides are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.

Most individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not

Clinicians

Most individuals should receive the intervention.

Adherence to the recommendation could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator.

Different choices will be appropriate for individual patients, who will require assistance in arriving at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aides may be useful in helping individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences.

Policymakers

The recommendation can be adopted as policy in most situations.

Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders.

[5] WHO handbook for guideline development – 2nd ed. Chapter 10, page 129

 

 


- Recommendations

The following statements and flowchart were adapted from the “Multidisciplinary European Guideline for Tinnitus: Diagnostics, Assessment, and Treatment, 2019” (MEGT) [2] which has the highest scores as regards the currency, contents, and quality.

Recommendations statements



Clinical questions

Action Recommendation

Level of Evidence (High, moderate, low, very low)

Strength of recommendation After Adaptation by Egyptian AVM: (Strong, conditional 

Study Type

Reference

1. Diagnostics, assessments, and outcomes:



1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


There are causal diagnostics and severity-oriented diagnostics:

I.  A comprehensive patient history:

1) Tinnitus history.

2)  Thorough audiological history and complaint prioritization.

3) Medical history.

4) Presence of comorbidities/drug history/medications.

5) Relevant personal history, occupational history, hobbies/ leisure activities, noise exposure, head/ neck trauma, social support status, education, recent life events.

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6



















1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


1) Tinnitus history: Tinnitus involves the percept of a sound or sounds in the ear or head without an external source.

•  Onset, course, duration:

Since when. sudden or gradually with a continuous increase? It can be acute < 3 months, sub-acute (3-6 months) or chronic

(>6months) duration.

Important associated clinical factors (noise trauma, stress, recent events, acute illness, other).

•  Unilateral or bilateral?

•  Character?

Modulation? (Helps to differentiate causes of objective tinnitus which can be pulsatile or non-pulsatile (Somatosensory tinnitus [respiratory, articular]).

N.B. Pulsatile tinnitus follows a person’s heartbeat and can be either subjective or objective. It is commonly associated with venous and arterial abnormalities. Pulsatile tinnitus can be discriminated as venous or arterial, based on whether it disappears with pressure in the jugular vein or not). The overall approach and assessment of patients with pulsatile tinnitus differs from that for patients with subjective tinnitus, and special clinical investigations should be implemented because serious and potentially reversible causes might be found.

N.B. Somatosensory tinnitus is considered when it can be modulated by somatic stimulation or movement.

Modulation by:

Orofacial, cervical or eye movements? Head positions?

Movements of the jaw, tension of jaw muscles? Physical exertions? breathing?

In some cases, pulsatile tinnitus can be modulated by movement of the head or upper lateral neck.

Severity/impact of the tinnitus: the degree established by a questionnaire

Is the tinnitus bothersome/ interfering with daily life (sleep difficulties, task interruptions, fearful reactions, cognitive-attentional problems, negative affect)?

A questionnaire should be used to establish the degree to which a patient experiences subjective tinnitus as bothersome or

distressing (see Sect. 1.d. for more details).

•  The level of tinnitus awareness:

- perceived only in silence or also in noise?

- easily masked or amplified by ordinary background noise?

- changes in tinnitus loudness?

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6

1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


2) Thorough audiological history and analysis of the complaint and complaint prioritization:

▪️ “Ear fullness”, or

▪️ Hyperacusis.

▪️ problems in balance/ dizziness/vertigo

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6

1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


3)  Medical history:

• ear, nose and throat,

•  orthopaedic,

•  cervical,

•  dental, jaw,

•  internal medicine,

•  mental disorders (psychological, psychiatric).

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6

1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


4)  Presence of comorbidities/drug history/ medications; ototoxic drugs; long-term pharmacological consumption (e. g. antidepressants, anxiolytics)

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6


1.a. Minimum patient assessment (It is crucial to perform

a detailed history/ clinical examination)


5) Relevant personal history, occupational history, hobbies/leisure activities, noise exposure, head/ neck trauma, social support status, education, recent life events

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion  

6

1.a. Minimum patient as- sessment (It is crucial to per- form a detailed history/ clinical examination)


II- Conduct a thorough physical–medical assessment to exclude

possible treatable (physical/medical) causes of tinnitus:

◾Complete ear, nose, and throat examination,

especially Otoscopy (preferably micro-otoscopy) to exclude presence of wax, tympanic membrane rupture, otitis media with effusion, chronic otitis media, or any other pathology. In Otoscopy: Special attention to retro-tympanic mass, Schwartz sign, in addition to other clinical examination for pulsatile tinnitus:

• Ask the patient to tick his/her finger in each pulse, while taking

radial pulse

• Press jugular vein and ask patient whether tinnitus is alternated

• Use a stethoscope for auscultation of the ear (mastoid, external auditory meatus) and carotid artery (neck), and chest in pulsatile tinnitus, as clinically indicated.

Special consideration should be given in rare tinnitus causes (e. g. palatal myoclonus, temporomandibular joint [TMJ] disorders).

A comprehensive diagnostic investigation:

• Pure tone audiometry,

• Speech audiometry,

•  Evaluation of the perceptional quality of tinnitus

(e.g., Loudness, pitch, and minimum masking estimations),

•  Sound tolerance assessment by Loudness Discomfort Level for tones, to be used for sound sensitivity grading or hearing aid settings.

• Tympanometry and acoustic reflex

N.B. Care must be taken in performing any of the previous loud- ness-based diagnostic investigations, particularly where there is evidence of recent fluctuations in loudness or intensity of the patient’s tinnitus or reduced sound tolerance.

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6

1.b. Further assessment


III- Further investigations or referrals in special cases. Only to be

considered if clinically indicated:

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and/or magnetic res-

onance imaging (MRI).

High-frequency audiometry in cases of tinnitus with normal hearing at standard (conversational) frequencies.

◾Further Radiological evaluation for pulsatile tinnitus [7, 8, 9]:

ü Arterial pulsatile tinnitus:

 Carotid triplex (stenosis)

•  Computed tomography angiography (glomus, aneurysms, atherosclerosis, arteriovenous malformations)

ü Venous pulsatile tinnitus:

•  Magnetic resonance angiography (arteriovenous malformations, empty sella syndrome, Arnold–Chiari malformation, Sylvius aqueduct stenosis, sigmoid sinus diverticulosis, etc.).

• N.B. high-resolution, temporal bone CT in case of retrotympanic mass (glomus tympanicum, aberrant internal carotid artery, or jugular bulb abnormalities) if diagnosed, no other imaging stud- ies are needed [9].

• When imaging is normal, consider benign intracranial hypertension (BIH), especially in patients with a high body mass index.

Further investigations or referrals in special cases. Only to be

considered if clinically indicated:

•  Residual inhibition to evaluate short-term effects of sound on

the tinnitus

•  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and/or distortion product otoacoustic emissions in cases of normal standard audiogram and suspicion of cochlear dysfunction

•  Vestibular investigations: e.g., videonystagmography (VNG), video head impulse test (vHIT), and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP), as indicated in cases of dizziness, vertigo, or balance problems

•  Functional cervical diagnostics in a quiet environment for detecting tinnitus modulations in somatosensory tinnitus. Consider imaging of cervical spine in cervical pathology associated with somatosensory tinnitus.

•  Dental examination (including temporomandibular joint (TMJ)) in a quiet environment for detecting tinnitus modulations in TMJ dysfunction or bruxism

•  Laboratory investigations, [e.g., complete blood count (CBC): for hyperdynamic circulation (anemia, etc..) …etc..]

•  Fundus examination: for Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH)

MRI of the brain in abnormal auditory brainstem response or abnormal vestibular evoked myogenic potential. 

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6, 7, 8, 9

1.c. Red Flags that need urgent referral for Assessment/ Management


1. Unilateral tinnitus

2. Tinnitus in association with asymmetric or unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

3. Pulsatile tinnitus

4. Tinnitus in association with significant acute vertigo

5. Tinnitus secondary to head trauma

6. Tinnitus in association with significant neurological symptoms and/or signs

7. Tinnitus causing psychological distress.

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

 Expert’s opinion

1

1.d. Assessment by questionnaires


Tinnitus severity in terms of distress/impact:

Tinnitus patients who report complaints/ show decompensation (grade 2 and higher: (refer to the flowchart) should be evaluated with a measure of tinnitus-related disability, such as:

The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire) (Newman et al., 1996) [10]

The Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) (Hallam, 1996) [11]

The Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ) (Wilson et al., 1991) [12]

◾ The Tinnitus Severity Index (TSI) (Meikle et al, 1995) [13].

The Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) (Kuk et al.,1990) [14]

The Tinnitus Severity Questionnaire (TSQ) (Coles et al., 1991) [15

The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) questionnaire (Meikle et al,

2012) [16]

The TQ and the THI are widely used in clinical practice and clinical trials. Additionally, almost all existing clinical practice guidelines recommend using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [17] to assess negative affect coinciding with or reactionary to tinnitus.

N.B. There are available tinnitus questionnaires in Arabic language to be used by Egyptians: Arabic translation of the already present Tinnitus questionnaires and newly developed and validated Arabic Tinnitus questionnaires:

Arabic translation of the THI [18, 19], TRQ [20], TFI [21] Arabic translation of HADS [22], Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire (TPFQ) (Tyler et al., 2014) [23] Arabic translation [24]. Available Newly Developed Arabic Tinnitus questionnaires, Arabic Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire [25], Arabic Tinnitus Cognition Questionnaire [26], Arabic self-assessment Tinnitus distress scale [27]

Very Low

Strong Recommendation for

Expert’s opinion

6

 

Clinical questions

Action Recommendation

Level of Evidence (High, moderate, low, very low)

Strength of recommendation After Adaptation by Egyptian AVM: (Strong, conditional 

Study Type

Reference

 

Treatment options and referral pathways. Available treatments and evidence:

 

 



2. a. Drug/

pharmacological

 

Treatment of acute tinnitus is given according to treatment of acute sudden hearing loss. But, if tinnitus occurs acutely without hearing loss, the standard cortisone therapy is not recommended. Therapeutic approaches such as intratympanic steroid treatment have no effect on tinnitus.

Any increase in tinnitus severity or distress in chronic tinnitus should not be treated as new onset tinnitus but should be regarded and treated as a fluctuation of chronic tinnitus.

Very Low

Strong Recommendation Against (acute tinnitus), but Strong Recommendation for (acute sudden hearing loss)

Expert’s opinion

28

 

For chronic tinnitus, many classes of drugs have been used or trialed, including various antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics, glutamate receptor antagonists, antidepressants, muscle relaxants, and others, with little evidence of benefit over harm.

 

There is no evidence for the effectiveness of drug treatments specifically for tinnitus but evidence for potentially significant side effects. Recommendation is based on systematic reviews and randomized trials. No drug can generally be recommended for the treatment of chronic tinnitus. However, psychiatric comorbidities associated with tinnitus (anxiety, depression) may need drug treatment. Antidepressants should not be prescribed to tinnitus patients without the diagnosis of depression.

High


Strong Recommendation Against (chronic tinnitus), but Conditional Recommendation for (associated comorbidities)

 Systematic Reviews

6, 29, 30

 




2. b. Hearing loss interventions


 

2. b.i. Cochlear

implants.


Cochlear implantation is recommended only for patients meeting the hearing loss criteria for candidacy. Recommendation for tinnitus based on evidence for safety but low-level evidence of effectiveness. 

Also, a recent systematic review (Assouly et al., 2021) [32], where patients in the included studies had tinnitus as a primary complaint, i.e., all had asymmetrical hearing loss or single-sided deafness, revealed that electrical stimulation by cochlear implants in patients with a primary complaint of tinnitus has a positive impact on tinnitus distress. Nevertheless, only small sample sizes were found, and studies showed considerable risks of bias.

High

Strong Recommendation Against (tinnitus), but Strong Recommendation for (deafness)

 Systematic Reviews

6, 31, 32

 

2. b. Hearing loss interventions

 

2. b. ii. Hearing

aids.


• Hearing aids are recommended for the management of hearing loss and should be considered as an option for patients with tinnitus and hearing loss. Recommendation is based on evidence of effectiveness and safety in RCTs of hearing aids for hearing loss and tinnitus, and systematic reviews considering hearing aids for tinnitus.

•  Hearing aids should not be offered to tinnitus patients without hearing loss. Tinnitus might be a parameter to be considered in hearing aid fitting and consequent relevant decision-making.

High

Conditional Recommendation for

Systematic Reviews, RCTs

33-38

 

•  Combination hearing aids (including amplification and sound generator in the same device) are another option for patients who may benefit from both amplification and passive sound stimulation.

 

Hearing aids are found to be equally beneficial to combination hearing aids for tinnitus with hearing loss.

High

Conditional Recommendation for

RCT

39  

 

2.c.Neurostimulation:

2.c. i. Transcranial electrical stimulation.

2.c. ia. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

2.c. ib. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)


There is evidence for safety but no evidence for the effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation for tinnitus. Recommendation is based on systematic review and RCTs.

High

Strong Recommendation Against

Systematic Review, RCTs

40-45

 

2.c. ii. Transcranial Vagus nerve stimulation.


Paired with sound stimuli (to promote reorganization in the auditory Cortex: There is evidence for safety but insufficient evidence that vagus nerve stimulation treatments have effects on tinnitus. Recommendation is based on the lack of RCTs or systematic review.

moderate

Conditional Recommendation Against

RC pilot study

46

 



2.c. iii. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)


A recent study (Galal et al., 2020) [47] included five randomized controlled double-blind trials in this systematic review investigating the efficacy of rTMS for at least six months post treatment, one followed up monthly for 10 months. TMS reduced the THI score and decreased the severity of tinnitus in 45% of patients and lead to a complete recovery in 32% of cases in one study. However, the meta-analysis demonstrated lack of significant effect of TMS on tinnitus management. An updated meta-analysis (Yin et al, 2021) [48] demonstrated that rTMS improved tinnitus-related symptoms, in terms of the short-term and long-term effects (6 months) on the THI scores, but the TQ and BDI scores demonstrated little immediate benefit. Future research on large samples in multi-centre settings with longer follow-up durations was recommended.

High

Conditional Recommendation for

Systematic Reviews, meta-analysis

47, 48

 


2.c.iv. Acoustic co- ordinated reset (CR®) neuromodulation.


Acoustic CR® neuromodulation is a sound therapy involving a randomized sequence of four “phase resetting” tones adjusted to the patient’s dominant tinnitus pitch that are hypothesized to generate a lasting desynchronization of the pathological brain

High

Conditional Recommendation for

Systematic review

49

 

2. c.v. Invasive neurostimulation treatments:

 

2. c.v.i. Direct (i. e. implanted electrode) Vagus nerve stimulation, paired with acoustic stimulation for tinnitus

 

chronic electrical vestibulocochlear nerve stimulation

 

2. c.v.ii. Cortical surface stimulation brain surface (extradural) implanted electrodes,

 

2.c.v.iii. Deep brain neural stimulator implantation.




There is no high-level evidence for the effectiveness or safety of invasive treatments for tinnitus. Recommendation is based on lack of RCTs or systematic review.

very low

Conditional Recommendation against

 a scoping review

50

 


2.d. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)


Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus (CBT4T) to modify dysfunctional behaviours and beliefs. It often includes a combination of several elements (such as education, counselling, exposure, mindfulness, relaxation, hearing rehabilitation).

Stepped-care multimodal CBT4T approach in which: audiological diagnostics, treatment and consultation as well as CBT-treatment elements are combined.

◾ Face-to-face CBT treatment

◾ CBT in a self-help format (internet-based or otherwise).

CBT should be guided and monitored by specialized doctors i.e., psychiatrists.

There is high-level evidence for the effectiveness and safety of CBT for tinnitus. Recommendation is based on systematic review and one further RCT.

High

Strong Recommendation for

 Systematic Review, RCT

51, 52

 





2.e. Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT)


Based on the neurophysiological model of tinnitus. It utilizes directive counselling to decrease the negative tinnitus-evoked reactions and sound to decrease the strength of tinnitus signal. The principal goal of TRT is to achieve habituation of tinnitus through the re- training of the brain.

Based on a medical evaluation of tinnitus, patients are placed into one of five general categories, each with a specific variant of TRT treatment, and all patients receive counselling and sound therapy, with substantial differences. Sound therapy acts by providing the auditory systems with constant neutral signs with sound generators, hearing aids, or background noise.

There is evidence for safety but little high-level evidence for the effectiveness of TRT.

Based on availability of a recent meta-analyses and systematic review (Han et al., 2021) [53], analysis of limited studies low-quality evidence with a high risk of bias showed that the TRT was an effective treatment for tinnitus, which could improve the response rate of tinnitus and reduce the THI scale.

High

Conditional Recommendation for

meta-analyses and systematic review

38, 53

 








2.f. Sound therapy


There is evidence for safety but little high-level evidence for the effectiveness of sound therapy. Recommendation is based on RCTs and a systematic review.

Sound therapy (including masking, music, environmental sound) may be useful for acute relief purposes but is not considered an effective intervention with long-term results.

Acoustic stimulation might improve tinnitus through some interaction with tinnitus mechanisms, through the partial or complete masking of tinnitus, and/or through certain cognitive influences (diversion, stress management etc.).

Sound therapy is used in different ways, and

includes:

Tinnitus masking therapy.

◾ Neuromonics approach. consists of an acoustic stimulation combining music and broadband noise and counselling. The spectrum of this combination is customized to provide an equalized stimulation over the audible frequency range and provide stimulation within the deprived sensory region, and to promote relaxation and relief.

◾Notched music stimulation. the notch (1 octave width) being chosen to correspond to the tinnitus pitch. This approach is thought to reverse the “maladaptive cortical reorganization”.

Customized music stimulation. aimed at reversing the tinnitus-related central changes due to hearing deprivation

High

Conditional Recommendation for

RCTs Systematic Review

54-60

 





2.g. Dietary

and alternative

therapies


There is evidence that dietary and alternative therapies have no proven efficacy and pose potential harm in the management of tinnitus. Recommendation is based on RCTs and systematic reviews with methodological concerns.

Dietary and alternative therapies (e.g.

◾Ginkgo biloba. herbal supplement

◾Melatonin: a hormone secreted by the pineal gland that is involved with regulation of the sleep– wake cycle.

◾Dietary supplements.

•  Zinc,

•  lipoflavonoids,

•  garlic,

•   homeopathy,

•  traditional Chinese/Korean herbal medicine,

•  honeybee larvae, and

Other various vitamins and minerals.

High

Strong Recommendation Against

Systematic Review,  

61-66

 


2.h. Acupuncture.


There is evidence for safety but little high-level evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture. Recommendation is based on systematic review

High

Conditional Recommendation Against

Systematic Review, RCTs

67

 












3. Patient information and support.


 

•   It is essential to successful tinnitus treatment that patients are provided with reliable information and learning resources.

•  The provision of information should be timely and fill gaps in knowledge, dispel myths, offer hope, and provide key messages that are a framework for treatment.

• Information should never be negative.

In the assessment, information is gathered about how tinnitus is affecting the patient in their daily life, about their understanding of tinnitus, and their concerns or fears surrounding it. This can be used to explore with them how their beliefs about tinnitus and the meaning they attach to it influences how they think, feel, and react to it. Health-care professionals should be compassionate to the concerns and fears expressed by patients.

High

Strong Recommendation for

Cochrane Review

68

 

→       Patient information and support topics should be tailored to the patient’s need and what is available to them. Topics include:

◾What is tinnitus?

◾What causes and maintains it?

◾Pulsatile tinnitus (follows heartbeat)

◾Common misunderstandings and Myths

◾Hearing loss and hearing aids

◾Ear wax removal

◾Hyperacusis and tinnitus

◾Protecting your hearing

◾Habituating to tinnitus

◾Relaxation

◾Monitoring tinnitus

◾Use of sound

◾Dealing with sleep problems

◾ Dealing with emotional consequences of tinnitus

◾Self-help and support groups

 



4- Measuring The 

Tinnitus Treatment

Outcome


Measuring improvement:

by finding a change from a degree of severity to less degree of severity after an intervention, using the same questionnaire before and after the intervention, or

by finding a minimum clinically significant change in a before- after treatment score (a meaningful response criterion) by using the THI or TFI Questionnaires:

7-point reduction in THI (Newman et al., 1996) [10], even if no change in tinnitus degree of severity.

13-point reduction in TFI (Meikle et al., 2012) [16], even if no change in tinnitus degree of severity.

N.B. Arabic language tinnitus questionnaires are available for use by the Egyptians [18-27].

High

Strong Recommendation for

Systematic Review

6, 69, 70

 



- Research needs

Research questions.

There is a need to conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of Sound therapy.

There is a need to conduct RCTs to determine the efficacy of Neuromodulation.

There is a need to conduct RCTs to determine the efficacy of Combining therapies.

There is a need to determine the efficacy and safety of different management strategies for tinnitus and hyperacusis in children.


- Monitoring and evaluating the impact of the guideline

Monitoring/ Auditing Criteria: to assess guideline implementation or adherence to recommendations.

▪️ Performing a targeted history and thorough Basic Audiological Evaluation as a minimum patient assessment, with further audio-vestibular investigations only if indicated, and urgent referral of any tinnitus Red Flags.

▪️ Providing information about tinnitus and treatment options.

▪️ Prescribing hearing aids only when patients have a diagnosed hearing loss.

▪️ Specialized cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus should be offered when needed.


- Updating of the guideline

Updating Procedure:

Any recommendation of this guideline will be updated when new evidence that could potentially impact the current evidence base for this recommendation is identified. If no new reports or information are identified for a particular recommendation, the recommendation will be revalidated. The focus will be on recommendations supported by very-low- or low certainty evidence and where new recommendations or a change in the published recommendations may be needed.

- References

1. Henry JA, Zaugg TL, Myers PJ, Kendall CJ, Michaelides EM. A triage guide for tinnitus. J Fam Pract. 2010 Jul;59(7):389-93.

2. Cima RF, Mazurek B, Haider H, Kikidis D, Lapira A, Noreña, AJ, and Hoare DJ. (2019): A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment. HNO, 67, 10-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-019-0633-7.

3. Graham DI, MB Harrison, Brouwers M. Evaluating and adapting practice guidelines for local use: a conceptual framework. Practice guidelines evaluation and adaptation cycle. In: Pickering S, Thompson J, editors. Clinical governance in practice. London: Harcourt, 2003:213–29.

4. http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.

5. WHO handbook for guideline development – 2nd ed. Chapter 10, page 129

6. Møller AR, Langguth B, DeRidder D, Kleinjung T, [eds.]. Textbook of tinnitus. First edition, Springer Verlag, New York, 2011.

7. Hofmann E, Behr R, Neumann-Haefelin T, Schwager K. Pulsatile tinnitus: imaging and differential diagnosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110(26):451.

8. Pegge SA, Steens SC, Kunst HP, Meijer FJ. Pulsatile tinnitus: differential diagnosis and radiological work-up. Curr Radiol Rep. 2017;5(1):5.

9. Sismanis A. Pulsatile Tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003;36(2):389–402.

10. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1996;122 (2):143–148.

11. Hallam RS. Manual of the tinnitus questionnaire (TQ). Psychological Corporation, London. 1996.

12. Wilson PH, Henry J, Bowen M, Haralambous G. Tinnitus reaction questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1991;34(1):197–201.

13. Meikle MB, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Press LS. Measuring the negative impact of tinnitus: a brief severity index. In: Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 1995;167.

14. Kuk FK, Tyler RS, Russell D, Jordan H. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear. 1990;11(6):434–445.

15. Coles RRA, Lutman ME, Axelsson A, Hazell JWP. Tinnitus severity gradings: cross sectional studies. Fourth International Tinnitus Seminar, Bourdeaux. 1991;27–30:453–455.

16. Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Folmer RL et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear Hear. 2012;33(2):153–176.

17.  Zigmond AS and Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.

18.  Dabbous A, El-Refaie HA, Farid AS and Ghannoum MT. (2005): Directive Counseling in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy, Med J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 72, No. 4. (Suppl. II) December: 127-132.

19.  Mahrous M, Kamal N, Tawfik S, Nassar AA. (2011): Study of gabapentin and clonazepam therapy in management of tinnitus patients. (Unpublished MD. Thesis, Ain-Shams University, Egypt.

20. Mohamed NS, Ismail NM, Abou-Elhassan HA. (2021): Validation of Arabic Version of Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire in Egyptian population. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation; 32(3) TJPR_2021_2651, 2021.

21. Shabana MI, Dabbous AO, Abdelmajeed MA, and Abdelkarim AMM. “Counselling and amplification with and without fractal music (Zen tones) for management of patients suffering from hearing loss and tinnitus”, Hearing, Balance and Communication, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 41-55, 2018.

22. Terkawi AS, Tsang S, AlKahtani GJ, Al-Mousa SH, Al Musaed S, AlZoraigi US, Alasfar EM, Doais KS, Abdulrahman A, Altirkawi KA. (2017): Development and validation of Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Saudi J Anaesth. May;11(Suppl 1): S11-S18.

23. Tyler R, Ji H, Perreau A, Witt S, Noble W, Coelho C. Development and validation of the tinnitus primary function questionnaire. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(3):260-72.

24. Talaat, HS, Zein El Abedein, A., Ali, R. (2020): Trans-adaptation and Standardization of Arabic Version of Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire, Egyptian Journal of Ear, Nose, Throat and Allied Sciences, 21(2):51-55.

25.  Mekki S, Youssef UM, Ghazaly M, Ibraheem O. (2022): The development and validation of a questionnaire for tinnitus reaction in the Arabic language in adults with normal hearing. EJENTAS, Accepted April 2022, Article in press.

26. Mahrous M, Kamal N, Tawfik S, Nassar AA. (2011): Study of gabapentin and clonazepam therapy in management of tinnitus patients. (Unpublished MD. Thesis, Ain-Shams University, Egypt.

27.  Mahrous M, Kamal N, Hazzaa N, El-Kholy W. (2004): Evaluation of temporal processing in tinnitus patients with sensorineural hearing loss. (Unpublished MSc. Thesis, Ain-Shams University, Egypt.

28.  Hesse G (2016) Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy. GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology. Head Neck Surg 15: Doc 04

29.  Baldo P, Doree C, Lazzarini R, Molin P, McFerran DJ (2006) Antidepressants for patients with tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006(4):CD003853

30.  Jufas NE, Wood R (2015) The use of benzodiazepines for tinnitus: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol129(S3): S14–S22

31.  Ramakers GG, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Grolman W (2015) The effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus in patients with bilateral hearing loss: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 125(11):2584–2592

32.  Assouly KKS, van Heteren JAA, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman I, Smit AL. (2020): Cochlear implantation for patients with tinnitus - A systematic review. Prog Brain Res. 2021; 260:27-50. doi: 10.1016/ bs.pbr.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

33. Del Bo L, Ambrosetti U (2007) Hearing aids for the treatment of tinnitus. Prog Brain Res 166:341–345

34. Ferguson MA, KitterickPT, Chong LY, Edmondson-Jones M, Barker F, Hoare DJ (2017) Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults. Cochrane Database SystRev2017(9):CD12023

35. Henry JA, McMillan G, Dann S, Bennett K, Griest S, Theodoroff S, Saunders G et al (2017) Tinnitus management: randomized controlled trial comparing extended-wear hearing aids, conventional hearing aids, and combination instruments. JAmAcadAudiol28(6):546–561

36. Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Sereda M, Akeroyd MA, Hall D (2014) Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss. Cochrane Libr2014(1):CD010151

37. Nguyen MF, Bonnefoy M, Adrait A, Gueugnon M, Petitot C, Collet L, Perrot X et al (2017) Efficacy of hearing aids on the cognitive status of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and hearing loss: A multicenter controlled randomized trial. J Alzheimers Dis 58(1):123–137

38.  Parazzini M, Del Bo L, Jastreboff M, Tognola G, Ravazzani P (2011) Open ear hearing aids in tinnitus therapy: an efficacy comparison with sound generators. Int J Audiol 50(8):548–553

39. Henry JA, Frederick M, Sell S, Griest S, Abrams H (2015) Validation of a novel combination hearing aid and tinnitus therapy device. Ear Hear 36(1):42–52

40. Benninger D, Pal N, Stephan M, Herrmann F, Maire R (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study (P2. 283). Baillieres Clin Neurol 82(10Supplement): P2–P283

41. Cavalcanti K, Brasil-Neto JP, Allam N, Boechat- Barros R (2015) A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of daily tDCS sessions targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on tinnitus handicap inventory and visual analog scale scores. BrainStimul8(5):978–980

42. Pal N, Maire R, Stephan MA, Herrmann FR, Benninger DH (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled study. Brain Stimul 8(6):1101–1107

43. Shekhawat GS, Searchfield GD, Stinear CM (2014) Randomized trial of transcranial direct current stimulation and hearing aids for tinnitus management. Neuro rehabil Neural Repair 28(5):410–419

44. Song JJ, Vanneste S, Van deHeyning P, De Ridder D (2012) Transcranial direct current stimulation in tinnitus patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Sci World J2012:427941

45. Vanneste S, Song JJ, De Ridder D (2013) Tinnitus and musical hallucinosis: the same but more. Neuroimage 82:373–383

46. Tyler R, Cacace A, Stocking C, Tarver B, Engineer N, Martin J, Burress C et al (2017) Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a prospective randomized double blind controlled pilot study in humans. Sci Rep 7(1):11960

47. Galal S, Ismail N, Niel G. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Tinnitus Management. Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2020;31;9(1): e356.

48. Yin L, Chen X, Lu X, An Y, Zhang T, Yan J. (2021): An updated meta- analysis: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating tinnitus. J Int Med Res. Mar;49(3):300060521999549.

49. Wegger M, Ovesen T, Larsen DG (2017) Acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation: a systematic review of a novel therapy for Tinnitus. Front Neurol 8:36

50. Hoare DJ, Adjamian P, Sereda M (2016) Electrical stimulation of the ear, head, cranial nerve, or cortex for the treatment of tinnitus: a scoping review. Neural Plast2016:5130503

51. Cima RFF, Maes IH, Joore MA, ScheyenDJ, El Refaie A, Baguley DM, Vlaeyen JW et al (2012) Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet379(9830):1951–1959

52.  Cima RFF, Andersson G, Schmidt CJ, Henry JA (2014) Cognitive-behavioral treatments or Tinnitus: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Audiol 25(1):29–61

53. Han M, Yang X, Lv J. Efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy in the treatment of tinnitus: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(6):103151.

54. Hobson J, Chisholm E, El Refaie A (2012) Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults. Cochrane Libr 2012(11):CD006371

55. Li SA, Bao L, Chrostowski M (2016) Investigating the effects of a personalized, spectrally altered music-based sound therapy on treating Tinnitus: a blinded, randomized controlled trial. Audiol Neurotol 21(5):296–304

56. Newman CW, Sandridge SA (2012) A comparison of benefit and economic value between two sound therapy tinnitus management options. J Am Acad Audiol 23(2):126–138

57.  Noreña AJ (2011) An integrative model of tinnitus based on a central gain controlling neural sensitivity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(5):1089–1109

58. Okamoto H, Stracke H, Stoll W, Pantev C (2010) Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(3):1207–1210

59. Pantev C, Okamoto H, Teismann H (2012) Tinnitus: the dark side of the auditory cortex plasticity. Ann NYAcadSci1252(1):253–258

60. Stein A, Wunderlich R, Lau P, Engell A, Wollbrink A, Shaykevich A, Pantev C et al (2016) Clinical trial on tonal tinnitus with tailor-made notched music training. BMC Neurol 16(1):38

61. Hilton M, Stuart E (2004) Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004(2):CD003852

62. Posadzki P, Watson L, Ernst E (2013) Herb-drug interactions: an overview of systematic reviews. Br J Clin Pharmacol 75(3):603–618

63. von Boetticher A (2011) Ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of tinnitus: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 7:441

64.  Rejali D, Sivakumar A, Balaji N (2004) Ginkgo biloba does not benefit patients with tinnitus: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29(3):226–231

65. Coelho C, Witt SA, Ji H, Hansen MR, Gantz B, Tyler R (2013) Zinc to treat tinnitus in the elderly: a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial. Otol Neurotol 34(6):1146–1154

66. Neri G, De Stefano A, Baffa C, Kulamarva G, Di Giovanni P, Petrucci G, Poliandri A, Dispenza F, Citraro L, Croce A. Treatment of central and sensorineural tinnitus with orally administered Melatonin and Sulodexide: personal experience from a randomized controlled study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009 Apr;29(2):86-91.

67. Kim JI, Choi JY, Lee DH, Choi TY, Lee MS, Ernst E (2012) Acupuncture for the treatment of tinnitus: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. BMCComplementAlternMed12(1):97

68. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Trevena L (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Libr 2017(4):CD001431

69. Fuller TE, Haider HF, Kikidis D, Lapira A, Mazure kB, Noreña A, Brueggemann PG et al (2017) Different teams, same conclusions? A systematic review of existing clinical guidelines for the assessment and treatment of tinnitus in adults. FrontPsychol8:206

70.  Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ, Lau P, Rabau S, Jones-Diette J, Fuller T et al (2016) Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials 17(1):270

71. Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, Rosenfeld RM, Chandrasekhar SS, Cunningham ER, Jr, Archer SM, Blakley BW, Carter JM, Granieri EC, Henry JA, Hollingsworth D, Khan FA, Mitchell S, Monfared A, Newman CW, Omole FS, Phillips CD, Robinson SK, Taw MB, Tyler RS, Waguespack R, Whamond EJ. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2 Suppl):S1–S40. doi: 10.1177/0194599814545325.

72.  Hoare DJ, Byrom P, Stockdale D, Goss J, Fackrell K, Kay T, Wray N, Cullane B, Sereda M. Practice Guidance Tinnitus in adults British Society of Audiology (BSA) 2019 http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Practice-Guidance_Tinnitus-in-Adults_for-member-consultation_30AUG2019.pdf

73.  Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (2015).  German S3 Guideline 01A/064: Chronic Tinnitus [AWMF-Register Nr. 01A/064 Klasse: S3 Chronischer Tinnitus]. AWMF online. https://www.awmf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Leitlinien/01A_D_G_f_Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde__Kopf-_und_Halschirurgie/01A-064e_S3_guideline_tinnitus_english_2015-08.pdf

74. Ogawa K, Sato H, Takahashi M, Wada T, Naito Y, Kawase T, Murakami S, Hara A, Kanzaki S. Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic tinnitus in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Feb;47(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 9. PMID: 31606294.

75. Tinnitus: NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline. Publication date: 11 March 2020, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng155


- Annexes

Editorial Independence:

▪️ This guideline was developed without any external funding.

All the guideline development group members have declared that they do not have any competing interests.

Annex 1: Guideline Flowchart


Annex 2: Tables of appraisal of selected guidelines: currency (table 1), content (table 2), and quality (table 3), of the selected guidelines {2, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75], according to the Practice guidelines evaluation and adaptation cycle [3].
 

Table 1. Guidelines Currency:


 

Table 2. Assessment of Content:



Table 3. Assessment of Quality (CPG Appraisal tool):


Annex 3: The benefits and harms of all added, modified statements, N.B. No omitted statements 

Consideration Of Benefits and Harms that were considered when formulating the recommendations are shown in the following tables (4 & 5):

Table 4: Original and adapted Summary of CPG recommendations of the selected guideline:










Table 5: Summary of Added CPG recommendations for the selected guideline: